Net Unrealized Profit/Loss
55.26% -0.24%
Value Days Destroyed Multiple
0.0
Bitcoin Dominance
58.6% +0.46%
Fear and Greed Index
60 -6.25%
Mayer Multiple
1.17 +0.00%
US vs Offshore Trading Volume
7.5%
Circulating Supply
19,908,256.25 +0.00%
Halving Countdown
33.6%
Hashrate vs Price
978.73 EH/s +4.75%
Node Map
23,469
Difficulty Estimator
79,679,234,551,296 +0.00%
Miner Revenue
$56,094,948.46 +4.75%
Network Difficulty
129.44T +0.00%
Puell Multiple
1.34 +4.55%
Exchange Trading Volume
$37.35B +11.54%
Exchange Trading Volume BTC
$5.21B -4.34%
Exchange Volume BTC Dominance
13.9% -14.23%
Monthly Exchange Volume
$1.06T
Start typing to search
Search through charts, users, and news
Navigate
ESC
Close
↵
Open
⌘
Open in new tab
MicroStategy has acquired an additional 430 BTC for $51.4 million. View their latest purchase on Bitcoin Treasuries.
The Newhedge Bitcoin Retirement Calculator is now live and available for all users to access.
Login
Left Axis
Bitcoin Price
Sign up to Newhedge
Return to limited chart view here
Value Days Destroyed Multiple Chat
0 messages
Value Days Destroyed Multiple stats
about 2 hours
Terminal Stats
1
0
The Value Days Destroyed (VDD) Multiple is a metric designed to identify periods when Bitcoin’s price may be overheating, often ahead of major cycle tops. It builds on the established Coin Days Destroyed metric, which tracks how long coins have remained dormant before being moved, giving more weight to older, larger holdings re-entering the market.
Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) measures the number of coins moved multiplied by the number of days they were held. For example, 5 BTC held for 20 days and then spent equals 100 coin days destroyed. This makes long-dormant coins far more significant than frequently moved coins.
Because older coins typically belong to long-term participants, their movement often signals meaningful shifts in market sentiment, such as profit-taking near peaks.
Value Days Destroyed extends this concept by multiplying CDD by the Bitcoin price at the time of transfer. This allows activity to be compared across different price environments, making historical comparisons more accurate.
The Value Days Destroyed Multiple then:
* Takes the 30-day average of VDD and divides it by the 365-day average.
* Creates an oscillator showing short-term spending deviations against the long-term baseline.
* Normalizes the value by adjusting for circulating supply relative to the fixed 21 million BTC cap.
This ensures the metric remains consistent as Bitcoin matures, avoiding distortions from early volatility or supply growth.
The VDD Multiple has historically peaked ahead of or alongside Bitcoin cycle tops. For example:
* In 2011, the metric topped around 3.3 before the price high.
* In 2013 and 2017, it peaked around 4.0–4.4 near cycle tops.
* In 2021, the peak was just below 4.0, again before the final price high.
When the VDD Multiple rises, it reflects a surge of Bitcoin moving back into the market, typically to be sold. Most recently, the metric has risen to 2.6, a level higher than the 2019 rally peak (2.3) but still below prior cycle extremes. This suggests that while the market has heated up, it has not yet reached the historically frothy levels associated with final cycle tops.
A notable feature of the current cycle is how quickly the VDD Multiple has risen compared to previous pre-halving years. In prior cycles, this level of activity was usually seen closer to late-stage bull markets. The rise reflects long-term holders increasingly moving coins back into circulation, often aligning with profit-taking as narratives such as ETF approvals and the halving drive price momentum.
Historically, the timing of VDD Multiple peaks has also coincided with macroeconomic shifts. In 2019, the metric topped out as the first rate cuts began. Similar dynamics may play out again, with monetary policy potentially influencing whether this cycle’s peak occurs sooner or stretches further.
The Value Days Destroyed Multiple highlights when older, long-held Bitcoin begins flowing back into the market at elevated rates. These periods typically signal increased selling pressure from experienced holders, marking overheated conditions. Conversely, low values suggest conviction among long-term investors, with fewer willing to sell at current prices, often a sign of undervaluation.