Circulating Supply
19,810,340.625 +0.00%
Fear and Greed Index
70 +11.11%
Google Trends
97.0 +32.88%
Node Map
20,595
Bitcoin Dominance
57.1% -0.75%
Mayer Multiple
1.31 +2.34%
US vs Offshore Trading Volume
8.17%
Halving Countdown
18.7%
Hashrate vs Price
845.61 EH/s +20.32%
Difficulty Estimator
79,679,234,551,296 +0.00%
Miner Revenue
$47,089,285.01 +22.18%
Network Difficulty
110.45T +0.00%
Puell Multiple
1.17 +22.08%
Exchange Trading Volume
$61.72B -32.88%
Exchange Trading Volume BTC
$20.68B -30.99%
Exchange Volume BTC Dominance
33.5% +2.82%
Monthly Exchange Volume
$915.04B
Start typing to search through charts, users, and news
Navigate
ESC
Close
↵
Open
⌘
Open in new tab
MicroStrategy has acquired 2,530 BTC for ~$243 million. View their new purchase on Bitcoin Treasuries.
Bitcoin hits a new ATH of $108,281.78!
Login
Bitcoin Dominance Chat
0 messages
Bitcoin Dominance stats
57.1%
-0.65%
8 minutes
Terminal Stats
47
9
Bitcoin dominance measures Bitcoin’s market capitalization as a share of the total cryptocurrency market capitalization. While straightforward in concept, this metric is instrumental in understanding market sentiment and liquidity flows.
Since its inception, Bitcoin has consistently held a dominant position in the cryptocurrency market, even amidst the rise of thousands of altcoins. Its dominance has fluctuated between the low 30% range and highs above 90%, highlighting its enduring strength as the crypto ecosystem continues to evolve.
Bitcoin dominance is a key indicator of capital allocation within the crypto market. It provides insights into risk appetite: during bullish phases, investors often flock to smaller-cap altcoins, reducing Bitcoin’s share. Conversely, in bearish markets, capital tends to flow back to Bitcoin as a safer haven.
This metric also helps gauge market dynamics, offering signals about the onset of “Bitcoin seasons” or “Altcoin seasons,” which reflect shifts in relative performance.
Bitcoin dominance ranged between 90%-99% between 2009 and 2017 due to a lack of significant competition. However, the ICO boom in 2017, driven by Ethereum’s rise, sparked a wave of new altcoins. This surge in speculative interest caused Bitcoin dominance to plummet to an all-time low of around 32% by early 2018.
The subsequent bear market saw many altcoins fail, with investors retreating to Bitcoin, causing its dominance to rebound to 70% by mid-2019. This trend reversed again in 2020 during “DeFi Summer,” when decentralized finance projects captured investor attention.Since then, Bitcoin dominance has surged back to around 60%, marking a strong resurgence as the hype surrounding speculative altcoins fades and the market increasingly gravitates toward Bitcoin’s reliability and established presence.
Bitcoin dominance can often align with broader market trends:
Rising Bitcoin price and increasing dominance: Indicates Bitcoin outperforming altcoins.
Rising Bitcoin price and declining dominance: Suggests altcoins are growing faster, signaling an altcoin season.
Falling Bitcoin price and increasing dominance: Implies capital is moving into Bitcoin as a safer asset.
Falling Bitcoin price and declining dominance: Indicates capital outflows from the entire market.
Understanding these patterns helps investors navigate the shifting tides of the crypto market, especially during periods of heightened volatility.
Bitcoin Dominance, while a valuable indicator, has notable limitations that can affect its interpretation. The metric includes all cryptocurrencies, regardless of their purpose, which can distort the picture of Bitcoin’s actual market position. For example, stablecoins are primarily designed as bridges between fiat and crypto rather than independent monetary systems. Their inclusion inflates the total market cap, diluting Bitcoin’s share and misrepresenting its influence among coins vying to function as decentralized money.
Similarly, many ICO tokens and other centralized projects are factored into Bitcoin Dominance despite being fundamentally different from Bitcoin. These assets often lack decentralization and operate under central control, making them ill-suited as competitors to Bitcoin’s vision of a global, decentralized currency. Additionally, as the crypto market expands with assets serving niche purposes—like governance or specific utility functions—the metric becomes less reflective of Bitcoin’s role as “hard money.”
Another key issue is the rise of alternative consensus mechanisms, such as proof-of-stake, which some cryptocurrencies adopt. These models differ fundamentally from Bitcoin’s proof-of-work system, which emphasizes decentralization and security. By treating all cryptocurrencies equally, Bitcoin Dominance may overlook the importance of this distinction, complicating its use as a tool for assessing Bitcoin’s position in its core mission: becoming a globally recognized, decentralized store of value and medium of exchange.